GeForce 805A vs Go 6800 Ultra

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1360not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.28no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)
GPU code nameNV41GK208
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date24 February 2005 (20 years ago)22 July 2014 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17192
Core clock speed450 MHz719 MHz
Boost clock speed450 MHz758 MHz
Number of transistors190 million915 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)89 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate5.40012.13
Floating-point processing powerno data0.2911 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs1216
L1 Cacheno data32 KB
L2 Cacheno data128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz1001 MHz
Memory bandwidth38.4 GB/s16.02 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (11_0)
Shader Model3.05.1
OpenGL2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)4.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-3.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 February 2005 22 July 2014
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 89 Watt 15 Watt

GeForce 805A has an age advantage of 9 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 493.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce Go 6800 Ultra and GeForce 805A. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800 Ultra
GeForce Go 6800 Ultra
NVIDIA GeForce 805A
GeForce 805A

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 4 votes

Rate GeForce Go 6800 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate GeForce 805A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce Go 6800 Ultra or GeForce 805A, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.