Tesla M10 vs GeForce Go 6250

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated504
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data2.53
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameNV44 A2GM107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 February 2006 (18 years ago)18 May 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7640
Core clock speed400 MHz1033 MHz
Boost clock speed400 MHz1306 MHz
Number of transistors75 million1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate1.60052.24
Floating-point processing powerno data1.672 TFLOPS
ROPs216
TMUs440

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount32 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed350 MHz1300 MHz
Memory bandwidth5.6 GB/s83.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (11_0)
Shader Model3.05.1
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-5.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 2006 18 May 2016
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 110 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 225 Watt

Go 6250 has 2150% lower power consumption.

Tesla M10, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 292.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce Go 6250 and Tesla M10. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce Go 6250 is a notebook card while Tesla M10 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce Go 6250
GeForce Go 6250
NVIDIA Tesla M10
Tesla M10

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce Go 6250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 5 votes

Rate Tesla M10 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.