Tesla C2090 vs GeForce Go 6200
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1554 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 0.19 | no data |
| Architecture | Curie (2003−2013) | Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) |
| GPU code name | NV44 A2 | GF110 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 February 2006 (20 years ago) | 25 July 2011 (14 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 7 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 651 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 300 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 75 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 110 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 16 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 1.200 | 41.66 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 1.332 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 2 | 48 |
| TMUs | 4 | 64 |
| L1 Cache | no data | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | no data | 768 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 248 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 MB | 6 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 300 MHz | 924 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 4.8 GB/s | 177.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 9.0c (9_3) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 3.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | N/A | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | - | 2.0 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 February 2006 | 25 July 2011 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 MB | 6 GB |
| Chip lithography | 110 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 16 Watt | 250 Watt |
Go 6200 has 1462.5% lower power consumption.
Tesla C2090, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 19100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 175% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between GeForce Go 6200 and Tesla C2090. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce Go 6200 is a notebook graphics card while Tesla C2090 is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
