ATI Radeon X1050 AGP vs GeForce Go 6200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1547not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.19no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Rage 8 (2002−2007)
GPU code nameNV44 A2RV350
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 February 2006 (19 years ago)7 December 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7no data
Core clock speed300 MHz250 MHz
Boost clock speed300 MHzno data
Number of transistors75 million60 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)16 Watt24 Watt
Texture fill rate1.2001.000
ROPs24
TMUs44

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16AGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRDDR
Maximum RAM amount32 MB128 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed300 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidth4.8 GB/s6.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)9.0 (9_0)
Shader Model3.0no data
OpenGL2.12.0
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 2006 7 December 2006
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 110 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 16 Watt 24 Watt

Go 6200 has a 18.2% more advanced lithography process, and 50% lower power consumption.

ATI X1050 AGP, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 months, and a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between GeForce Go 6200 and Radeon X1050 AGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce Go 6200 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon X1050 AGP is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce Go 6200
GeForce Go 6200
ATI Radeon X1050 AGP
Radeon X1050 AGP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 7 votes

Rate GeForce Go 6200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 3 votes

Rate Radeon X1050 AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce Go 6200 or Radeon X1050 AGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.