Radeon Pro V340 16 GB vs GeForce Go 6200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1552not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.19no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameNV44 A2Vega 10
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 February 2006 (19 years ago)26 August 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores73584 ×2
Core clock speed300 MHz852 MHz
Boost clock speed300 MHz1500 MHz
Number of transistors75 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)16 Watt230 Watt
Texture fill rate1.200336.0 ×2
Floating-point processing powerno data10.75 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs264 ×2
TMUs4224 ×2
L1 Cacheno data896 KB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRHBM2
Maximum RAM amount32 MB16 GB ×2
Memory bus width64 Bit2048 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed300 MHz945 MHz
Memory bandwidth4.8 GB/s483.8 GB/s ×2
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_1)
Shader Model3.06.7
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 2006 26 August 2018
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 110 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 16 Watt 230 Watt

Go 6200 has 1337.5% lower power consumption.

Pro V340 16 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, a 51100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 685.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce Go 6200 and Radeon Pro V340 16 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce Go 6200 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro V340 16 GB is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce Go 6200
GeForce Go 6200
AMD Radeon Pro V340 16 GB
Radeon Pro V340 16 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 7 votes

Rate GeForce Go 6200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.7 3 votes

Rate Radeon Pro V340 16 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce Go 6200 or Radeon Pro V340 16 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.