RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs GeForce Go 6200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1556not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.19no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNV44 A2AD104
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 February 2006 (20 years ago)21 March 2023 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores75120
Core clock speed300 MHz1725 MHz
Boost clock speed300 MHz2250 MHz
Number of transistors75 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)16 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate1.200360.0
Floating-point processing powerno data23.04 TFLOPS
ROPs264
TMUs4160
Tensor Coresno data160
Ray Tracing Coresno data40
L1 Cacheno data5 MB
L2 Cacheno data48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount32 MB12 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed300 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth4.8 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.8
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 2006 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 12 GB
Chip lithography 110 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 16 Watt 100 Watt

Go 6200 has 525% lower power consumption.

RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 17 years, a 38300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce Go 6200 and RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce Go 6200 is a notebook graphics card while RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 7 votes

Rate GeForce Go 6200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 5 votes

Rate RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce Go 6200 or RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.