Tesla K80m vs GeForce Go 6150

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)
GPU code nameC51MVGK210
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 February 2006 (18 years ago)17 November 2014 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32x 2496
Core clock speed1 MHz562 MHz
Boost clock speed425 MHz824 MHz
Number of transistorsno data7,100 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data300 Watt
Texture fill rateno data2x 182.2 billion/sec
ROPsno data2x 48
TMUsno data2x 208

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeshared MemoryGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data2x 12 GB
Memory bus widthno data2x 384 Bit
Memory clock speedno data5012 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data2x 240.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXshared Memory12.0 (11_1)
OpenGLno data4.6

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 2006 17 November 2014
Chip lithography 110 nm 28 nm

Tesla K80m has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 292.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce Go 6150 and Tesla K80m. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce Go 6150 is a notebook card while Tesla K80m is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce Go 6150
GeForce Go 6150
NVIDIA Tesla K80m
Tesla K80m

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.7 11 votes

Rate GeForce Go 6150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 10 votes

Rate Tesla K80m on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.