Arctic Sound-M vs GeForce Go 6150

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1547not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataGeneration 12.5 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameC51MVArctic Sound
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 February 2006 (20 years ago)2022 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38192
Core clock speed1 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed425 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data8,000 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data500 Watt
Texture fill rateno data230.4
Floating-point processing powerno data14.75 TFLOPS
ROPsno data128
TMUsno data256
L2 Cacheno data8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeshared MemoryHBM2e
Maximum RAM amountno data16 GB
Memory bus widthno data4096 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1200 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1.23 TB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXshared Memory12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 110 nm 10 nm

Arctic Sound-M has a 1000% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce Go 6150 and Arctic Sound-M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce Go 6150 is a notebook graphics card while Arctic Sound-M is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce Go 6150
GeForce Go 6150
Intel Arctic Sound-M
Arctic Sound-M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.7 11 votes

Rate GeForce Go 6150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Arctic Sound-M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce Go 6150 or Arctic Sound-M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.