Radeon R5 A220 vs GeForce Go 6100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1554not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameC51MVCaicos
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 February 2006 (20 years ago)2014 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3160
Core clock speed1 MHz775 MHz
Boost clock speed425 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data370 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data35 Watt
Texture fill rateno data6.200
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeshared MemoryDDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data1 GB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1800 MBps
Memory bandwidthno data14.4 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x HDMI 1.3a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXshared Memory11.2 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.0
OpenGLno data4.4
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 110 nm 40 nm

R5 A220 has a 175% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce Go 6100 and Radeon R5 A220. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce Go 6100 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon R5 A220 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 19 votes

Rate GeForce Go 6100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 35 votes

Rate Radeon R5 A220 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce Go 6100 or Radeon R5 A220, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.