Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile vs GeForce GTX TITAN Z

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking298not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.13no data
Power efficiency4.36no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGK110BLucienne
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date28 May 2014 (11 years ago)12 January 2021 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5760 ×2512
Core clock speed705 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed876 MHz1900 MHz
Number of transistors7,080 million9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)375 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate210.2 ×260.80
Floating-point processing power5.046 TFLOPS ×21.946 TFLOPS
ROPs48 ×28
TMUs240 ×232
L1 Cache240 KBno data
L2 Cache1536 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Length267 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width3-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount12 GB ×2System Shared
Memory bus width768-bit (384-bit per GPU) ×2System Shared
Memory clock speed7.0 GB/sSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth672 GB/s ×2no data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D+-
3D Gaming+-
3D Vision+-
3D Vision Live+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.7 (6.4)
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 May 2014 12 January 2021
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 375 Watt 25 Watt

Graphics 512SP Mobile has an age advantage of 6 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 1400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX TITAN Z and Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX TITAN Z is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
AMD Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile
Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 96 votes

Rate GeForce GTX TITAN Z on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 66 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX TITAN Z or Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.