GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER vs GTX TITAN Z
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 299 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 1.11 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 4.32 | no data |
| Architecture | Kepler (2012−2018) | Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) |
| GPU code name | GK110B | GB203 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 28 May 2014 (11 years ago) | 2026 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,999 | $999 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 5760 ×2 | 10752 |
| Core clock speed | 705 MHz | 2295 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 876 MHz | 2617 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 7,080 million | 45,600 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 375 Watt | 415 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 210.2 ×2 | 879.3 |
| Floating-point processing power | 5.046 TFLOPS ×2 | 56.28 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48 ×2 | 112 |
| TMUs | 240 ×2 | 336 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 336 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 84 |
| L1 Cache | 240 KB | 10.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1536 KB | 64 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 5.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | 304 mm |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | no data |
| Width | 3-slot | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 1x 16-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR7 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB ×2 | 24 GB |
| Memory bus width | 768-bit (384-bit per GPU) ×2 | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7.0 GB/s | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 672 GB/s ×2 | 1.02 TB/s |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort | 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b |
| Multi monitor support | 4 displays | no data |
| HDMI | + | + |
| HDCP | + | - |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | no data |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | no data |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Blu Ray 3D | + | - |
| 3D Gaming | + | - |
| 3D Vision | + | - |
| 3D Vision Live | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.8 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.4 |
| CUDA | + | 12.0 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 24 GB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 375 Watt | 415 Watt |
GTX TITAN Z has 10.7% lower power consumption.
RTX 5080 SUPER, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX TITAN Z and GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
