GMA X3500 vs GeForce GTX TITAN Z

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking263not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.20no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Generation 4.0 (2006−2007)
GPU code nameGK110BBearlake
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date28 May 2014 (10 years ago)1 August 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5760 ×2no data
Core clock speed705 MHz667 MHz
Boost clock speed876 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,080 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)375 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate210.2 ×25.336
Floating-point processing power5.046 TFLOPS ×2no data
ROPs48 ×21
TMUs240 ×28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width3-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount12 GB ×2System Shared
Memory bus width768-bit (384-bit per GPU) ×2System Shared
Memory clock speed7.0 GB/sSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth672 GB/s ×2no data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPortNo outputs
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D+-
3D Gaming+-
3D Vision+-
3D Vision Live+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)9.0c
Shader Model5.13.0
OpenGL4.42.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 May 2014 1 August 2007
Chip lithography 28 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 375 Watt 13 Watt

GTX TITAN Z has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

GMA X3500, on the other hand, has 2784.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX TITAN Z and GMA X3500. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
Intel GMA X3500
GMA X3500

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 82 votes

Rate GeForce GTX TITAN Z on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 11 votes

Rate GMA X3500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX TITAN Z or GMA X3500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.