Radeon Pro V320 vs GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking145not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.51no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameN16E-GXX SLIVega 10
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date22 September 2015 (10 years ago)29 June 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40963584
Core clock speed1126 MHz852 MHz
Boost clock speed1228 MHz1500 MHz
Number of transistors10400 Million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)330 Watt230 Watt
Texture fill rateno data336.0
Floating-point processing powerno data10.75 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data224
L1 Cacheno data896 KB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount2x 8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed3500 MHz945 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data483.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
G-SYNC support+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 September 2015 29 June 2017
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 330 Watt 230 Watt

Pro V320 has an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 43.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile and Radeon Pro V320. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro V320 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile
GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile
AMD Radeon Pro V320
Radeon Pro V320

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 70 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 7 votes

Rate Radeon Pro V320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile or Radeon Pro V320, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.