ATI Radeon IGP 345M vs GeForce GTX 970M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking3611545
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency12.60no data
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameGM204RS200
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date7 October 2014 (10 years ago)5 October 2002 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,560.89 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280no data
Core clock speed924 MHz183 MHz
Boost clock speed1038 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,200 million30 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknownno data
Texture fill rate83.040.37
Floating-point processing power2.657 TFLOPSno data
ROPs482
TMUs802

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)AGP 4x
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount3 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width192 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed2500 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth120 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
VGA аnalog display support+no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support+no data
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+-
GeForce ShadowPlay+-
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+-
Optimus+-
BatteryBoost+-
Ansel+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)7.0
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.51.4
OpenCL1.1N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 970M 5709
+285350%
ATI IGP 345M 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p136no data
Full HD56no data
1440p25no data
4K22no data

Cost per frame, $

1080p45.73no data
1440p102.44no data
4K116.40no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 46 no data
Counter-Strike 2 24−27 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30 no data
Forza Horizon 4 60−65 no data
Forza Horizon 5 35−40 no data
Metro Exodus 41 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40 no data
Valorant 60−65 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 46 no data
Counter-Strike 2 24−27 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30 no data
Dota 2 33 no data
Far Cry 5 50−55 no data
Fortnite 59 no data
Forza Horizon 4 60−65 no data
Forza Horizon 5 35−40 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 49 no data
Metro Exodus 29 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 149 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 44 no data
Valorant 60−65 no data
World of Tanks 190−200 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40 no data
Counter-Strike 2 24−27 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30 no data
Dota 2 50−55 no data
Far Cry 5 50−55 no data
Forza Horizon 4 60−65 no data
Forza Horizon 5 35−40 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 38 no data
Valorant 60−65 no data

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 21−24 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14 no data
World of Tanks 100−110 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12 no data
Far Cry 5 35−40 no data
Forza Horizon 4 35−40 no data
Forza Horizon 5 21−24 no data
Metro Exodus 25 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22 no data
Valorant 35−40 no data

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7 no data
Dota 2 33 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 33 no data
Metro Exodus 7 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 38 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 33 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 13 no data
Counter-Strike 2 6−7 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 no data
Dota 2 24−27 no data
Far Cry 5 18−20 no data
Fortnite 15 no data
Forza Horizon 4 21−24 no data
Forza Horizon 5 10−12 no data
Valorant 16−18 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 October 2014 5 October 2002
Chip lithography 28 nm 180 nm

GTX 970M has an age advantage of 12 years, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 970M and Radeon IGP 345M. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
GeForce GTX 970M
ATI Radeon IGP 345M
Radeon IGP 345M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 317 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 970M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4 votes

Rate Radeon IGP 345M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.