ATI Radeon 9250 vs GeForce GTX 970M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4121609
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.55no data
Power efficiency12.98no data
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameGM204RV280
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 October 2014 (11 years ago)1 March 2004 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,560.89 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280no data
Core clock speed924 MHz240 MHz
Boost clock speed1038 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,200 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknownno data
Texture fill rate83.040.96
Floating-point processing power2.657 TFLOPSno data
ROPs484
TMUs804
L1 Cache480 KBno data
L2 Cache1536 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)AGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount3 GB64 MB
Memory bus width192 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed2500 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidth120 GB/s3.2 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
VGA аnalog display support+no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support+no data
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+-
GeForce ShadowPlay+-
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+-
Optimus+-
BatteryBoost+-
Ansel+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)8.1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.51.4
OpenCL1.1N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 970M 5721
+285950%
Samples: 3787
ATI 9250 2
Samples: 123

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p136no data
Full HD58no data
1440p27no data
4K21no data

Cost per frame, $

1080p44.15no data
1440p94.85no data
4K121.95no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 75−80 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30 no data
Resident Evil 4 Remake 27−30 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 66 no data
Counter-Strike 2 75−80 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30 no data
Far Cry 5 46 no data
Fortnite 163 no data
Forza Horizon 4 61 no data
Forza Horizon 5 40−45 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60 no data
Valorant 110−120 no data

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 54 no data
Counter-Strike 2 75−80 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 180−190 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30 no data
Dota 2 90−95 no data
Far Cry 5 43 no data
Fortnite 65 no data
Forza Horizon 4 53 no data
Forza Horizon 5 40−45 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 49 no data
Metro Exodus 24 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 49 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45 no data
Valorant 110−120 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 49 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30 no data
Dota 2 90−95 no data
Far Cry 5 39 no data
Forza Horizon 4 36 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 33 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 26 no data
Valorant 110−120 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 49 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 27−30 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 100−110 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24 no data
Metro Exodus 14 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130 no data
Valorant 140−150 no data

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 33 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14 no data
Far Cry 5 27 no data
Forza Horizon 4 23 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 31 no data

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 10−11 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 33 no data
Metro Exodus 7 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16 no data
Valorant 75−80 no data

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 15 no data
Counter-Strike 2 10−11 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 no data
Dota 2 50−55 no data
Far Cry 5 13 no data
Forza Horizon 4 6 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 14 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 October 2014 1 March 2004
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 150 nm

GTX 970M has an age advantage of 10 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 435.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 970M and Radeon 9250. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 970M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 9250 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 342 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 970M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 56 votes

Rate Radeon 9250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 970M or Radeon 9250, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.