GMA vs GeForce GTX 960M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5571606
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.26no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)PowerVR SGX545 (2008−2010)
GPU code nameGM107Cloverview
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date13 March 2015 (10 years ago)4 May 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640no data
Core clock speed1096 MHz533 MHz
Boost clock speed1176 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,870 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Wattno data
Texture fill rate47.041.066
Floating-point processing power1.505 TFLOPSno data
ROPs161
TMUs402
L1 Cache320 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 1.0 x16
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed2500 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth80 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
VGA аnalog display support+no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support+no data
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+-
GeForce ShadowPlay+-
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+-
Optimus+-
BatteryBoost+-
Ansel+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)9.0c
Shader Model5.13.0
OpenGL4.5ES 2.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 960M 3370
+168400%
Samples: 10128
GMA 2
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p95no data
Full HD35no data
1440p15no data
4K14no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 40−45 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 38 no data
Counter-Strike 2 40−45 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 no data
Far Cry 5 28 no data
Fortnite 99 no data
Forza Horizon 4 35 no data
Forza Horizon 5 24−27 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35 no data
Valorant 80−85 no data

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 31 no data
Counter-Strike 2 40−45 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 no data
Dota 2 60−65 no data
Far Cry 5 25 no data
Fortnite 40 no data
Forza Horizon 4 31 no data
Forza Horizon 5 24−27 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 31 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16 no data
Metro Exodus 12 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 29 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24 no data
Valorant 80−85 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 26 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 no data
Dota 2 60−65 no data
Far Cry 5 23 no data
Forza Horizon 4 25 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14 no data
Valorant 80−85 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 31 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 14−16 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 60−65 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 10−11 no data
Metro Exodus 8−9 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45 no data
Valorant 90−95 no data

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 17 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7 no data
Far Cry 5 15 no data
Forza Horizon 4 18 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 18 no data

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 20 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 3−4 no data
Metro Exodus 3−4 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10 no data
Valorant 40−45 no data

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 3 no data
Counter-Strike 2 2−3 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data
Dota 2 30−33 no data
Far Cry 5 7 no data
Forza Horizon 4 12−14 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 3−4 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 5 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 March 2015 4 May 2010
Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm

GTX 960M has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 960M and GMA. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M
GeForce GTX 960M
Intel GMA
GMA

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 1202 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 960M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 12 votes

Rate GMA on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 960M or GMA, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.