ATI Graphics Ultra vs GeForce GTX 960A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking553not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.50no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Mach (1992−1997)
GPU code nameGM107Mach8
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date13 March 2015 (11 years ago)1992 (34 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$899

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640no data
Core clock speed1029 MHz10 MHz
Boost clock speed1085 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,870 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm800 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Wattno data
Texture fill rate43.40no data
Floating-point processing power1.389 TFLOPSno data
ROPs161
TMUs40no data
L1 Cache320 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)ISA 16 Bit
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5VRAM
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit32 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz10 MHz
Memory bandwidth80.19 GB/s40 MB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)N/A
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA5.0-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 800 nm

GTX 960A has a 204700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2757% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 960A and Graphics Ultra. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 960A is a notebook graphics card while Graphics Ultra is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 20 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 960A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Graphics Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 960A or Graphics Ultra, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.