ATI Graphics Ultra + vs GeForce GTX 950M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking633not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.31no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)no data
GPU code nameGM107Mach32
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date13 March 2015 (11 years ago)1 January 1992 (34 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640no data
Core clock speed914 MHz10 MHz
Boost clock speed1124 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,870 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm800 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Wattno data
Texture fill rate44.96no data
Floating-point processing power1.439 TFLOPSno data
ROPs161
TMUs40no data
L1 Cache320 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCI
Widthno data1-slot
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3 or GDDR5DRAM
Maximum RAM amount4 GB1 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 or 2500 MHz10 MHz
Memory bandwidth32 or 80 GB/s80.0 MB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA
VGA аnalog display support+no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support+no data
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+-
GeForce ShadowPlay+-
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+-
Optimus+-
BatteryBoost+-
Ansel+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)None
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.5None
OpenCL1.2None
Vulkan1.1.126-
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 March 2015 1 January 1992
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 800 nm

GTX 950M has an age advantage of 23 years, a 409500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2757% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 950M and Graphics Ultra +. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 950M is a notebook graphics card while Graphics Ultra + is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 1246 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 950M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Graphics Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 950M or Graphics Ultra +, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.