ATI FireGL V3600 vs GeForce GTX 950A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking628not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.38no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameGM107RV630
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date13 March 2015 (10 years ago)28 June 2007 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$299

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640120
Core clock speed993 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed1124 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,870 million390 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt73 Watt
Texture fill rate44.964.800
Floating-point processing power1.439 TFLOPS0.144 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs408
L1 Cache320 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MB64 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR2
Maximum RAM amount2 GB256 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1001 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth32.03 GB/s16 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)10.0 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA5.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 March 2015 28 June 2007
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 73 Watt

GTX 950A has an age advantage of 7 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.

ATI FireGL V3600, on the other hand, has 2.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 950A and FireGL V3600. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 950A is a notebook graphics card while FireGL V3600 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A
GeForce GTX 950A
ATI FireGL V3600
FireGL V3600

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 13 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 950A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 2 votes

Rate FireGL V3600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 950A or FireGL V3600, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.