Arctic Sound 1T vs GeForce GTX 950A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking621not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.36no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Generation 12.5 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameGM107Arctic Sound
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date13 March 2015 (10 years ago)2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6406144
Core clock speed993 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed1124 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,870 million8,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt350 Watt
Texture fill rate44.96172.8
Floating-point processing power1.439 TFLOPS11.06 TFLOPS
ROPs1696
TMUs40192
L1 Cache320 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MB8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount2 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed1001 MHz1200 MHz
Memory bandwidth32.03 GB/s1.23 TB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA5.0-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 350 Watt

GTX 950A has 366.7% lower power consumption.

Arctic Sound 1T, on the other hand, has a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 950A and Arctic Sound 1T. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 950A is a notebook graphics card while Arctic Sound 1T is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A
GeForce GTX 950A
Intel Arctic Sound 1T
Arctic Sound 1T

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 13 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 950A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 2 votes

Rate Arctic Sound 1T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 950A or Arctic Sound 1T, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.