Radeon Graphics 512SP vs GeForce GTX 950

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking	348	not rated
Place by popularity	92	not in top-100
Value for money	6.03	no data
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2018)	GCN 5.1 (2018−2021)
GPU code name	GM206	Renoir
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	20 August 2015 (8 years ago)	7 March 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$159	no data
Current price	$12.88 (0.1x MSRP)	no data

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	512
CUDA cores	768	no data
Core clock speed	1024 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1188 MHz	2100 MHz
Number of transistors	2,940 million	9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	90 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	49.2 billion/sec	67.20
Floating-point performance	1,825 gflops	no data

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	PCI Express 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	IGP
Length	7.938" (20.2 cm)	no data
Height	4.376" (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	2-slot	IGP
Recommended system power (PSU)	350 Watt	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pins	None
SLI options	+	no data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	128 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	6.6 GB/s	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	105.6 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	no data

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2	Motherboard Dependent
Multi monitor support	4 displays	no data
HDMI	+	no data
HDCP	+	no data
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
G-SYNC support	+	no data
Audio input for HDMI	Internal	no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream	+	no data
GeForce ShadowPlay	+	no data
GPU Boost	2.0	no data
GameWorks	+	no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.7 (6.4)
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.3
CUDA	+	no data

Advantages and disadvantages

---

Recency	20 August 2015	7 March 2020
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	System Shared
Chip lithography	28 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	90 Watt	15 Watt

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---