Tegra K1 GPU vs GeForce GTX 950 Low Power

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)
GPU code nameGM206GK20A
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 March 2016 (9 years ago)15 October 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$159 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768192
Core clock speed1026 MHz756 MHz
Boost clock speed1190 MHz951 MHz
Number of transistors2,940 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt8 Watt
Texture fill rate57.127.608
Floating-point processing power1.828 TFLOPS0.3652 TFLOPS
ROPs324
TMUs488
L1 Cache288 KB16 KB
L2 Cache1024 KB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Length202 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1653 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth105.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.6ES 3.1
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.1261.1
CUDA5.23.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2016 15 October 2014
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 8 Watt

GTX 950 Low Power has an age advantage of 1 year.

Tegra K1 GPU, on the other hand, has 837.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and Tegra K1 GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 950 Low Power is a desktop graphics card while Tegra K1 GPU is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
NVIDIA Tegra K1 GPU
Tegra K1 GPU

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 8 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 950 Low Power on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 9 votes

Rate Tegra K1 GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 950 Low Power or Tegra K1 GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.