Radeon Pro WX 8100 vs GeForce GTX 950 Low Power

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGM206Vega 10
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 March 2016 (9 years ago)3 December 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$159 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7683584
Core clock speed1026 MHz1200 MHz
Boost clock speed1190 MHz1500 MHz
Number of transistors2,940 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt230 Watt
Texture fill rate57.12336.0
Floating-point processing power1.828 TFLOPS10.75 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs48224
L1 Cache288 KB896 KB
L2 Cache1024 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length202 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed1653 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth105.8 GB/s512.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort6x mini-DisplayPort
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.1.125
CUDA5.2-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2016 3 December 2017
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 230 Watt

GTX 950 Low Power has 206.7% lower power consumption.

Pro WX 8100, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and Radeon Pro WX 8100. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 950 Low Power is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro WX 8100 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
AMD Radeon Pro WX 8100
Radeon Pro WX 8100

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 10 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 950 Low Power on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon Pro WX 8100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 950 Low Power or Radeon Pro WX 8100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.