Radeon 660M vs GeForce GTX 950 Low Power

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated587
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data14.59
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGM206Rembrandt+
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 March 2016 (10 years ago)3 January 2023 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$159 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768384
Core clock speed1026 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speed1190 MHz1900 MHz
Number of transistors2,940 million13,100 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate57.1245.60
Floating-point processing power1.828 TFLOPS1.459 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs4824
Ray Tracing Coresno data6
L0 Cacheno data96 KB
L1 Cache288 KB128 KB
L2 Cache1024 KB2 MB
L3 Cacheno data8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length202 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1653 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth105.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA5.2-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2016 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 40 Watt

Radeon 660M has an age advantage of 6 years, a 367% more advanced lithography process, and 88% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and Radeon 660M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 950 Low Power is a desktop graphics card while Radeon 660M is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 19 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 950 Low Power on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 519 votes

Rate Radeon 660M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 950 Low Power or Radeon 660M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.