TITAN Ada vs GeForce GTX 880M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking453not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.64no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGK104AD102
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date12 March 2014 (10 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores153618432
Core clock speed954 MHz2235 MHz
Boost clock speed993 MHz2520 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)122 Watt800 Watt
Texture fill rate127.11,452
Floating-point processing power3.05 TFLOPS92.9 TFLOPS
ROPs32192
TMUs128576
Tensor Coresno data576
Ray Tracing Coresno data144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data336 mm
Widthno dataQuad-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 16-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount8 GB48 GB
Standard memory configurationGDDR5no data
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speedUp to 2500 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s1.15 TB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
eDP 1.2 signal supportUp to 3840x2160no data
LVDS signal supportUp to 1920x1200no data
VGA аnalog display supportUp to 2048x1536no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportUp to 3840x2160no data
HDMI++
HDCP content protection+-
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI+-
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+-
Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.13.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA+8.9

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 122 Watt 800 Watt

GTX 880M has 555.7% lower power consumption.

TITAN Ada, on the other hand, has a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 880M and TITAN Ada. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 880M is a notebook card while TITAN Ada is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
GeForce GTX 880M
NVIDIA TITAN Ada
TITAN Ada

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 113 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 880M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate TITAN Ada on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.