Radeon Vega 11 Embedded vs GeForce GTX 860M

Primary Details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking	484	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation	1.04	no data
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2018)	GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code name	N15P-GX	Raven
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	12 March 2014 (10 years ago)	13 February 2018 (6 years ago)
Current price	$875	no data

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	704
CUDA cores	1152 or 640	no data
Core clock speed	797 MHz	300 MHz
Boost clock speed	915 MHz	1300 MHz
Number of transistors	1,870 million	4,940 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	35 Watt
Texture fill rate	43.40	57.20
Floating-point performance	1,389 gflops	no data

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 860M and Radeon Vega 11 Embedded compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Bus support	PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0	no data
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	IGP
Width	no data	IGP
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
SLI options	+	no data

Memory type	GDDR5	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	System Shared
Standard memory configuration	GDDR5	no data
Memory bus width	128 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	Up to 2500 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	80.0 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
eDP 1.2 signal support	Up to 3840x2160	no data
LVDS signal support	Up to 1920x1200	no data
VGA аnalog display support	Up to 2048x1536	no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support	Up to 3840x2160	no data
HDMI	+	no data
HDCP content protection	+	no data
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI	+	no data
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming	+	no data

Supported Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data
Ansel	+	no data

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	2.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.2.131
CUDA	+	no data

Pros & Cons Summary

---

Recency	12 March 2014	13 February 2018
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	System Shared
Chip lithography	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	35 Watt

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---