Radeon R9 280X2 vs GeForce GTX 860M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking579not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.56no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameGM107Tahiti
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date13 January 2014 (11 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1152 or 6402048 ×2
Core clock speed797 MHz950 MHz
Boost clock speed1085 MHz1000 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 million4,313 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt375 Watt
Texture fill rate43.40128.0 ×2
Floating-point processing power1.389 TFLOPS4.096 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs1632 ×2
TMUs40128 ×2
L1 Cache320 KB512 KB
L2 Cache2 MB768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data315 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone3x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB3 GB ×2
Standard memory configurationGDDR5no data
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit ×2
Memory clock speedUp to 2500 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth80.0 GB/s288.0 GB/s ×2
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
eDP 1.2 signal supportUp to 3840x2160no data
LVDS signal supportUp to 1920x1200no data
VGA аnalog display supportUp to 2048x1536no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportUp to 3840x2160no data
HDMI+-
HDCP content protection+-
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI+-
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+-
Optimus+-
Ansel+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.16.5 (5.1)
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.12.1 (1.2)
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.170
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 3 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 375 Watt

GTX 860M has a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 860M and Radeon R9 280X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 860M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon R9 280X2 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
GeForce GTX 860M
AMD Radeon R9 280X2
Radeon R9 280X2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 489 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 860M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon R9 280X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 860M or Radeon R9 280X2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.