Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs GeForce GTX 860M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking578not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.57no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGM107TU102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date13 January 2014 (11 years ago)13 August 2018 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$6,299

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1152 or 6404608
Core clock speed797 MHz1275 MHz
Boost clock speed1085 MHz1620 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rate43.40466.6
Floating-point processing power1.389 TFLOPS14.93 TFLOPS
ROPs1696
TMUs40288
Tensor Coresno data576
Ray Tracing Coresno data72
L1 Cache320 KB4.5 MB
L2 Cache2 MB6 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB24 GB
Standard memory configurationGDDR5no data
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speedUp to 2500 MHz1625 MHz
Memory bandwidth80.0 GB/s624.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
eDP 1.2 signal supportUp to 3840x2160no data
LVDS signal supportUp to 1920x1200no data
VGA аnalog display supportUp to 2048x1536no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportUp to 3840x2160no data
HDMI+-
HDCP content protection+-
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI+-
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+-
Optimus+-
Ansel+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.13.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA+7.5
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 January 2014 13 August 2018
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 260 Watt

GTX 860M has 246.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 6000 Passive, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 860M and Quadro RTX 6000 Passive. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 860M is a notebook graphics card while Quadro RTX 6000 Passive is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
GeForce GTX 860M
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive
Quadro RTX 6000 Passive

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 493 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 860M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.9 9 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 6000 Passive on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 860M or Quadro RTX 6000 Passive, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.