Radeon RX 560 XT vs GeForce GTX 780
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 245 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Value for money | 16.63 | no data |
Architecture | Kepler (2012−2018) | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) |
GPU code name | GK110 | Ellesmere |
Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Release date | 23 May 2013 (10 years old) | 13 March 2019 (5 years old) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | no data |
Current price | $100 (0.2x MSRP) | $160 |
Value for money
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2304 | 1792 |
CUDA cores | 2304 | no data |
Core clock speed | 863 MHz | 973 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 900 MHz | 1073 MHz |
Number of transistors | 7,080 million | 5,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 150 Watt |
Maximum GPU temperature | 95 °C | no data |
Texture fill rate | 160.5 billion/sec | 120.2 |
Floating-point performance | 4,156 gflops | no data |
Size and compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | no data |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | 241 mm |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | no data |
Width | 2-slot | 2-slot |
Minimum recommended system power | 600 Watt | no data |
Supplementary power connectors | One 8-pin and one 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 6600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 288.4 GB/s | 211.2 GB/s |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Multi monitor support | 4 displays | no data |
HDMI | + | + |
HDCP | + | no data |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | no data |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | no data |
Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
Blu Ray 3D | + | no data |
3D Gaming | + | no data |
3D Vision | + | no data |
PhysX | + | no data |
3D Vision Live | + | no data |
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
GeekBench 5 OpenCL
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.
Benchmark coverage: 9%
Radeon RX 560 XT outperforms GeForce GTX 780 by 34% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.
GeekBench 5 Vulkan
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.
Benchmark coverage: 5%
Radeon RX 560 XT outperforms GeForce GTX 780 by 78% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan.
Advantages and disadvantages
Recency | 23 May 2013 | 13 March 2019 |
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 4 GB |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 150 Watt |
We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 780 and Radeon RX 560 XT. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.