Radeon R9 290X2 vs GeForce GTX 780

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking245not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation16.69no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameGK110Hawaii
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date23 May 2013 (10 years ago)24 June 2014 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$649 $1,399
Current price$100 (0.2x MSRP)$181 (0.1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23042816
CUDA cores2304no data
Core clock speed863 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,080 million6,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt580 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature95 °Cno data
Texture fill rate160.5 billion/sec176.0
Floating-point performance4,156 gflops2x 5,632 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length10.5" (26.7 cm)no data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot3-slot
Minimum recommended system power600 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectorsOne 8-pin and one 6-pin4x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount3 GB4 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed6008 MHz5400 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.4 GB/s345.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI++
HDCP+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D+no data
3D Gaming+no data
3D Vision+no data
PhysX+no data
3D Vision Live+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.3
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA+no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 May 2013 24 June 2014
Cost $649 $1399
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 580 Watt

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 780 and Radeon R9 290X2. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
GeForce GTX 780
AMD Radeon R9 290X2
Radeon R9 290X2

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 992 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 780 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 6 votes

Rate Radeon R9 290X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.