GRID K560Q vs GeForce GTX 780

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking320not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.12no data
Power efficiency5.84no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGK110GK104
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date23 May 2013 (12 years ago)2 July 2014 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$649 $3,599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23041536 ×2
Core clock speed863 MHz745 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,080 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt225 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature95 °Cno data
Texture fill rate173.295.36 ×2
Floating-point processing power4.156 TFLOPS2.289 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs4832 ×2
TMUs192128 ×2
L1 Cache192 KB128 KB
L2 Cache1536 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot2-slot
Minimum recommended system power600 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount3 GB4 GB ×2
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed1502 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.4 GB/s160.0 GB/s ×2

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPortNo outputs
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D+-
3D Gaming+-
3D Vision+-
PhysX+-
3D Vision Live+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)5.1
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL3.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1751.1.126
CUDA+3.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 May 2013 2 July 2014
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 225 Watt

GRID K560Q has an age advantage of 1 year, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 11.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 780 and GRID K560Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 780 is a desktop graphics card while GRID K560Q is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
GeForce GTX 780
NVIDIA GRID K560Q
GRID K560Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1126 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 780 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GRID K560Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 780 or GRID K560Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.