ATI Radeon VE vs GeForce GTX 780 Ti

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking2811608
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.50no data
Power efficiency6.97no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameGK110BRage 6
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date7 November 2013 (12 years ago)19 February 2001 (25 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2880no data
Core clock speed875 MHz183 MHz
Boost clock speed928 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,080 million30 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate222.70.55
Floating-point processing power5.345 TFLOPSno data
ROPs481
TMUs2403
L1 Cache240 KBno data
L2 Cache1536 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 4x
Length267 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount3 GB32 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed7.0 GB/s183 MHz
Memory bandwidth336 GB/s2.928 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D+-
3D Gaming+-
3D Vision+-
3D Vision Live+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)7.0
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)no data
OpenGL4.41.3
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.175N/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 780 Ti 9471
+473450%
Samples: 4805
ATI VE 2
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD96no data

Cost per frame, $

1080p7.28no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 130−140 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55 no data
Resident Evil 4 Remake 50−55 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 90−95 no data
Counter-Strike 2 130−140 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55 no data
Far Cry 5 75−80 no data
Fortnite 110−120 no data
Forza Horizon 4 90−95 no data
Forza Horizon 5 70−75 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95 no data
Valorant 160−170 no data

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 90−95 no data
Counter-Strike 2 130−140 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55 no data
Dota 2 120−130 no data
Far Cry 5 75−80 no data
Fortnite 110−120 no data
Forza Horizon 4 90−95 no data
Forza Horizon 5 70−75 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 80−85 no data
Metro Exodus 50−55 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70 no data
Valorant 160−170 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 90−95 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55 no data
Dota 2 120−130 no data
Far Cry 5 75−80 no data
Forza Horizon 4 90−95 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70 no data
Valorant 160−170 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 110−120 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 45−50 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45 no data
Metro Exodus 30−35 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 no data
Valorant 190−200 no data

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24 no data
Far Cry 5 50−55 no data
Forza Horizon 4 55−60 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 55−60 no data

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 21−24 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45 no data
Metro Exodus 20−22 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35 no data
Valorant 130−140 no data

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40 no data
Counter-Strike 2 21−24 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11 no data
Dota 2 75−80 no data
Far Cry 5 27−30 no data
Forza Horizon 4 40−45 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 24−27 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 November 2013 19 February 2001
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 23 Watt

GTX 780 Ti has an age advantage of 12 years, a 9500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 543% more advanced lithography process.

ATI VE, on the other hand, has 987% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 780 Ti and Radeon VE. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 736 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 780 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 1 vote

Rate Radeon VE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 780 Ti or Radeon VE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.