Radeon RX Vega Nano vs GeForce GTX 780 Ti 6 GB

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGK110BVega 10
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release dateno datano data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores28804096
Core clock speed875 MHz1200 MHz
Boost clock speed928 MHz1546 MHz
Number of transistors7,080 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt175 Watt
Texture fill rate222.7395.8
ROPs4864
TMUs240256

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm152 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount6 GB8 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed7 GB/s1600 MBps
Memory bandwidth336.6 GB/s409.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI 1.4a, 1x DisplayPort 1.21x HDMI 2.0b, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI++

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)6.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.2.1751.3
CUDA3.5-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 175 Watt

RX Vega Nano has a 33% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 43% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 780 Ti 6 GB and Radeon RX Vega Nano. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 51 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 780 Ti 6 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 4 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega Nano on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 780 Ti 6 GB or Radeon RX Vega Nano, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.