GRID K260Q vs GeForce GTX 780 6 GB

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated572
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.39
Power efficiencyno data2.38
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGK110BGK104
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date10 September 2013 (11 years ago)28 June 2013 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$937

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23041536
Core clock speed863 MHz745 MHz
Boost clock speed902 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,080 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate173.295.36
Floating-point processing power4.156 TFLOPS2.289 TFLOPS
ROPs4832
TMUs192128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount6 GB2 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.4 GB/s160.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.1.126
CUDA3.53.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 September 2013 28 June 2013
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 2 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 225 Watt

GTX 780 6 GB has an age advantage of 2 months, and a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GRID K260Q, on the other hand, has 11.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 780 6 GB and GRID K260Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 780 6 GB is a desktop graphics card while GRID K260Q is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 6 GB
GeForce GTX 780 6 GB
NVIDIA GRID K260Q
GRID K260Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 16 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 780 6 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GRID K260Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 780 6 GB or GRID K260Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.