GeForce GTX 775M vs 660 Ti

Place in performance ranking	384	438
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Value for money	2.61	1.64
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code name	GK104	N13E-GTX-A2
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	16 August 2012 (11 years ago)	24 September 2013 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$299	no data
Current price	$189 (0.6x MSRP)	$780

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 660 Ti has 59% better value for money than GTX 775M.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1344	1344
CUDA cores	1344	no data
Core clock speed	915 MHz	719 MHz
Boost clock speed	980 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	3,540 million	3540 Million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	100 Watt
Texture fill rate	102.5 billion/sec	no data
Floating-point performance	2,459.5 gflops	no data

Size and compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 660 Ti and GeForce GTX 775M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	large
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	no data
Length	9.5" (24.1 cm)	no data
Height	4.376" (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	Two 6-pin	no data
SLI options	+	+

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	192-bit GDDR5	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	6.0 GB/s	3600 MHz
Memory bandwidth	144.2 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort	no data
Multi monitor support	4 displays	no data
HDMI	+	no data
HDCP	+	no data
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
Audio input for HDMI	Internal	no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray	+	no data
3D Gaming	+	no data
3D Vision	+	no data
Optimus	no data	+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	11
Shader Model	5.1	no data
OpenGL	4.3	no data
OpenCL	1.2	no data
Vulkan	1.1.126	no data
CUDA	+	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 660 Ti 11.38
+22.6%

GTX 775M 9.28

660 Ti outperforms 775M by 23% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 660 Ti 4407
+22.7%

GTX 775M 3593

660 Ti outperforms 775M by 23% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 660 Ti 8415
+38.6%

GTX 775M 6071

660 Ti outperforms 775M by 39% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

GTX 660 Ti 15189
+26.4%

GTX 775M 12015

660 Ti outperforms 775M by 26% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

Octane Render OctaneBench

This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

GTX 660 Ti 43
+19.4%

GTX 775M 36

660 Ti outperforms 775M by 19% in Octane Render OctaneBench.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

77
+28.3%

60−65

−28.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

18−20
+28.6%

14−16

−28.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 +26.3%	18−20 −26.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 +28.6%	14−16 −28.6%
Battlefield 5	35−40 +25.8%	30−35 −25.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−33 +20%	24−27 −20%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +28.6%	14−16 −28.6%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +26.1%	21−24 −26.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 +29.2%	24−27 −29.2%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 +21.2%	30−35 −21.2%
Hitman 3	30−33 +30.4%	21−24 −30.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 +21.1%	18−20 −21.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 +18.8%	16−18 −18.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 +20%	20−22 −20%
Watch Dogs: Legion	21−24 +31.3%	16−18 −31.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 +26.3%	18−20 −26.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 +28.6%	14−16 −28.6%
Battlefield 5	35−40 +25.8%	30−35 −25.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−33 +20%	24−27 −20%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +28.6%	14−16 −28.6%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +26.1%	21−24 −26.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 +29.2%	24−27 −29.2%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 +21.2%	30−35 −21.2%
Hitman 3	30−33 +30.4%	21−24 −30.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 +21.1%	18−20 −21.1%
Metro Exodus	16−18 +21.4%	14−16 −21.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 +18.8%	16−18 −18.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 +20%	20−22 −20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +21.1%	18−20 −21.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	21−24 +31.3%	16−18 −31.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 +26.3%	18−20 −26.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 +28.6%	14−16 −28.6%
Battlefield 5	35−40 +25.8%	30−35 −25.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +28.6%	14−16 −28.6%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +26.1%	21−24 −26.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 +29.2%	24−27 −29.2%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 +21.2%	30−35 −21.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +21.1%	18−20 −21.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	21−24 +31.3%	16−18 −31.3%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 +21.4%	14−16 −21.4%
Hitman 3	18−20 +28.6%	14−16 −28.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 +13.3%	14−16 −13.3%
Metro Exodus	10−11 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 +33.3%	6−7 −33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 +25%	12−14 −25%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−12 +22.2%	9−10 −22.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	8−9 +60%	5−6 −60%
Battlefield 5	21−24 +40%	14−16 −40%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%
Far Cry 5	18−20 +20%	14−16 −20%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 +26.7%	14−16 −26.7%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 +31.3%	16−18 −31.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 +22.2%	9−10 −22.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8−9 +33.3%	6−7 −33.3%
Hitman 3	10−11 +11.1%	9−10 −11.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	9−10 +12.5%	8−9 −12.5%
Metro Exodus	5−6 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 +28.6%	7−8 −28.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Battlefield 5	10−11 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Far Cry 5	9−10 +12.5%	8−9 −12.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 +20%	10−11 −20%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 +36.4%	10−12 −36.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%