GeForce GTX 775M vs 1050 Mobile

Place in performance ranking	379	438
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Value for money	11.76	1.64
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code name	GP107B	N13E-GTX-A2
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	3 January 2017 (7 years old)	24 September 2013 (10 years old)
Current price	$256	$780

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1050 Mobile has 617% better value for money than GTX 775M.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	1344
CUDA cores	640	no data
Core clock speed	1354 MHz	719 MHz
Boost clock speed	1493 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	3,300 million	3540 Million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	100 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	97 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	59.72	no data

Size and compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile and GeForce GTX 775M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	large
Bus support	PCIe 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	no data
SLI options	-	+

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4000 MB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	7008 MHz	3600 MHz
Memory bandwidth	112 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	DP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI	no data
Multi monitor support	+	no data
HDCP	2.2	no data
G-SYNC support	+	no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream	+	no data
GPU Boost	3.0	no data
Optimus	no data	+
Ansel	+	no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	11
Shader Model	6.4	no data
OpenGL	4.5	no data
OpenCL	1.2	no data
Vulkan	1.2.131	no data
CUDA	+	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1050 Mobile 11.52
+24.1%

GTX 775M 9.28

1050 Mobile outperforms 775M by 24% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 1050 Mobile 4461
+24.2%

GTX 775M 3593

1050 Mobile outperforms 775M by 24% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 1050 Mobile 7693
+26.7%

GTX 775M 6071

1050 Mobile outperforms 775M by 27% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	73 +32.7%	55−60 −32.7%
Full HD	46 +31.4%	35−40 −31.4%
1440p	24 +33.3%	18−20 −33.3%
4K	15 +25%	12−14 −25%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	37 +94.7%	18−20 −94.7%
Battlefield 5	51 +64.5%	30−35 −64.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40 +60%	24−27 −60%
Far Cry 5	39 +69.6%	21−24 −69.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	38 +58.3%	24−27 −58.3%
Forza Horizon 4	55 +66.7%	30−35 −66.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27 +68.8%	16−18 −68.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	33 +65%	20−22 −65%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30 +57.9%	18−20 −57.9%
Battlefield 5	44 +41.9%	30−35 −41.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	33 +32%	24−27 −32%
Far Cry 5	36 +56.5%	21−24 −56.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	37 +54.2%	24−27 −54.2%
Forza Horizon 4	52 +57.6%	30−35 −57.6%
Metro Exodus	19 +35.7%	14−16 −35.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14 −14.3%	16−18 +14.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	29 +45%	20−22 −45%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	39 +105%	18−20 −105%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18 −5.6%	18−20 +5.6%
Battlefield 5	37 +19.4%	30−35 −19.4%
Far Cry 5	33 +43.5%	21−24 −43.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	33 +37.5%	24−27 −37.5%
Forza Horizon 4	37 +12.1%	30−35 −12.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	22 +15.8%	18−20 −15.8%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18 +28.6%	14−16 −28.6%
Metro Exodus	11 +57.1%	7−8 −57.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 +33.3%	6−7 −33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	17 +41.7%	12−14 −41.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	13 +44.4%	9−10 −44.4%
Battlefield 5	26 +73.3%	14−16 −73.3%
Far Cry 5	21 +40%	14−16 −40%
Far Cry New Dawn	24 +60%	14−16 −60%
Forza Horizon 4	26 +62.5%	16−18 −62.5%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10 +66.7%	6−7 −66.7%
Metro Exodus	7 +133%	3−4 −133%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8 +60%	5−6 −60%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7 +40%	5−6 −40%
Battlefield 5	13 +85.7%	7−8 −85.7%
Far Cry 5	11 +37.5%	8−9 −37.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	11 +10%	10−11 −10%
Forza Horizon 4	15 +36.4%	10−12 −36.4%

This is how GTX 1050 Mobile and GTX 775M compete in popular games:

900p resolution:

GTX 1050 Mobile is 32.7% faster than GTX 775M

1080p resolution:

GTX 1050 Mobile is 31.4% faster than GTX 775M

1440p resolution:

GTX 1050 Mobile is 33.3% faster than GTX 775M

4K resolution:

GTX 1050 Mobile is 25% faster than GTX 775M

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1050 Mobile is 133% faster than the GTX 775M.
in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 775M is 14.3% faster than the GTX 1050 Mobile.

All in all, in popular games:

GTX 1050 Mobile is ahead in 41 test (95%)
GTX 775M is ahead in 2 tests (5%)

Advantages and disadvantages

Performance score	11.52	9.28
Recency	3 January 2017	24 September 2013
Maximum RAM amount	4000 MB	4 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	100 Watt