GeForce 2 Go (200 / 100) vs GTX 775M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking465not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.52no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)no data
GPU code nameN13E-GTX-A2NV11
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date24 September 2013 (11 years ago)1 March 2001 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores13441
Core clock speed719 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data166 MHz
Number of transistors3540 Millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt2 Watt

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB64 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit32 / 64 Bit
Memory clock speed3600 MHz143 MHz
Shared memory--

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11DDR
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 September 2013 1 March 2001
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 2 Watt

GTX 775M has an age advantage of 12 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

2 Go (200 / 100), on the other hand, has 4900% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 775M and GeForce 2 Go (200 / 100). We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M
GeForce GTX 775M
NVIDIA GeForce 2 Go (200 / 100)
GeForce 2 Go (200 / 100)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 31 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 775M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.1 302 votes

Rate GeForce 2 Go (200 / 100) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.