765M vs 570M

#ad
Buy
VS
#ad
Buy

Combined performance score

GTX 570M
4.81

765M outperforms 570M by 7% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking602581
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money1.970.53
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameN12E-GTN14-GE
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date28 June 2011 (12 years old)30 May 2013 (10 years old)
Current price$163 $93
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 570M has 272% better value for money than GTX 765M.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores336768
CUDA cores336768
Core clock speed575 MHz850 MHz
Boost clock speedno data863 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 million2,540 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate32.2 billion/sec55.23
Floating-point performance772.8 gflops1,326 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 570M and GeForce GTX 765M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargelarge
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data
SLI options++

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount3 MB2 GB
Standard memory configurationno dataGDDR5
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth72.0 GB/s64.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
eDP 1.2 signal supportno dataUp to 3840x2160
LVDS signal supportno dataUp to 1920x1200
VGA аnalog display supportno dataUp to 2048x1536
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportno dataUp to 3840x2160
HDMIno data+
HDCP content protectionno data+
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMIno data+
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreamingno data+

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+no data
Blu-Ray 3D Supportno data+
3D Gaming+no data
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoderno data+
Optimus++
3D Vision / 3DTV Playno data+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 API
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.54.5
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 570M 4.81
GTX 765M 5.16
+7.3%

765M outperforms 570M by 7% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 570M 1863
GTX 765M 1998
+7.2%

765M outperforms 570M by 7% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 570M 11060
GTX 765M 14870
+34.4%

765M outperforms 570M by 34% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 570M 2399
GTX 765M 4019
+67.5%

765M outperforms 570M by 68% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

Octane Render OctaneBench

This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

GTX 570M 20
+5.3%
GTX 765M 19

570M outperforms 765M by 5% in Octane Render OctaneBench.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p37
−37.8%
51
+37.8%
Full HD53
+32.5%
40
−32.5%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Battlefield 5 14−16
−7.1%
14−16
+7.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−10%
10−12
+10%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
−10%
10−12
+10%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−13.3%
16−18
+13.3%
Hitman 3 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−8.3%
12−14
+8.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Battlefield 5 14−16
−7.1%
14−16
+7.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−10%
10−12
+10%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
−10%
10−12
+10%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−13.3%
16−18
+13.3%
Hitman 3 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−8.3%
12−14
+8.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−10%
10−12
+10%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Battlefield 5 14−16
−7.1%
14−16
+7.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−10%
10−12
+10%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
−10%
10−12
+10%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−13.3%
16−18
+13.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−10%
10−12
+10%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Hitman 3 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 1−2

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Hitman 3 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 0−1

This is how GTX 570M and GTX 765M compete in popular games:

900p resolution:

  • GTX 765M is 37.8% faster than GTX 570M

1080p resolution:

  • GTX 570M is 32.5% faster than GTX 765M

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 765M is 100% faster than the GTX 570M.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 765M is ahead in 46 tests (75%)
  • there's a draw in 15 tests (25%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 4.81 5.16
Recency 28 June 2011 30 May 2013
Maximum RAM amount 3 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 570M and GeForce GTX 765M. The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M
GeForce GTX 570M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
GeForce GTX 765M

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 28 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 64 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.