Radeon R7 360 896SP vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking486not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.78no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameno dataTobago
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date30 May 2013 (12 years ago)18 June 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536896
Core clock speed850 MHz1100 MHz
Number of transistors2x 2540 Million2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt85 Watt
Texture fill rateno data61.60
Floating-point processing powerno data1.971 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data56
L1 Cacheno data224 KB
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data183 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2x 2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width2x 128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed4000 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data96 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.3
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2.131
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 May 2013 18 June 2015
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 85 Watt

R7 360 896SP has an age advantage of 2 years, and 52.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 765M SLI and Radeon R7 360 896SP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 765M SLI is a notebook graphics card while Radeon R7 360 896SP is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M SLI
GeForce GTX 765M SLI
AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP
Radeon R7 360 896SP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.3 25 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 765M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 4 votes

Rate Radeon R7 360 896SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 765M SLI or Radeon R7 360 896SP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.