GeForce Go 7900 GS SLI vs GTX 765M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking490not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.78no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)G7x (2005−2006)
GPU code nameno dataG71M
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date30 May 2013 (12 years ago)1 June 2006 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores153654
Core clock speed850 MHz14 MHz
Boost clock speedno data375 MHz
Number of transistors2x 2540 Million556 Million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt40 Watt

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2x 2 GB1 GB
Memory bus width2x 128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed4000 MHz500 MHz
Shared memory--

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11GDDR3
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 May 2013 1 June 2006
Chip lithography 28 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 40 Watt

GTX 765M SLI has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

Go 7900 GS SLI, on the other hand, has 225% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 765M SLI and GeForce Go 7900 GS SLI. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M SLI
GeForce GTX 765M SLI
NVIDIA GeForce Go 7900 GS SLI
GeForce Go 7900 GS SLI

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.3 25 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 765M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce Go 7900 GS SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 765M SLI or GeForce Go 7900 GS SLI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.