Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
675M SLI vs 765M SLI
Price now
149$
Games supported
74%
- Interface
- Core clock speed 850
- Max video memory 2x 2048 MB
- Memory type GDDR5
- Memory clock speed 4000
- Maximum resolution
- Interface
- Core clock speed 620
- Max video memory
- Memory type GDDR5
- Memory clock speed 3000
- Maximum resolution
Price now
499$
Games supported
69%
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance rating | 346 | 408 |
| Value for money | 9.09 | 1.87 |
| Architecture | Kepler (2012−2018) | Fermi (2010−2014) |
| GPU code name | no data | N12E-GTX2 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 30 May 2013 (9 years old) | 6 January 2011 (12 years old) |
| Current price | $149 | $499 |
Value for money
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1536 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 620 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 2x 2540 Million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Thermal design power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 2x 100 Watt |
Dimensions and compatibility
Information on GeForce GTX 765M SLI and GeForce GTX 675M SLI compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Laptop size | large | large |
| SLI options | + | + |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2x 2 GB | no data |
| Memory bus width | 2x 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Optimus | + | + |
API support
APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.
| DirectX | 11 | 11 |
| CUDA | + | + |
Benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
- 3DMark Vantage Performance
- 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
Benchmark coverage: 16%
GeForce GTX 765M SLI outperforms GeForce GTX 675M SLI by 36% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.
Benchmark coverage: 16%
GeForce GTX 765M SLI outperforms GeForce GTX 675M SLI by 24% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 71 | no data |
Popular games
- Full HD
Low Preset - Full HD
Medium Preset - Full HD
High Preset - Full HD
Ultra Preset - 1440p
High Preset - 1440p
Ultra Preset - 4K
High Preset - 4K
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 18−20
+20%
|
14−16
−20%
|
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 21−24
+16.7%
|
18−20
−16.7%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 14−16
+25%
|
12−14
−25%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 35−40
+24.1%
|
27−30
−24.1%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 27−30
+16.7%
|
24−27
−16.7%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 18−20
+20%
|
14−16
−20%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 27−30
+22.7%
|
21−24
−22.7%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 27−30
+21.7%
|
21−24
−21.7%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
+20%
|
30−33
−20%
|
| Hitman 3 | 27−30
+22.7%
|
21−24
−22.7%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 21−24
+23.5%
|
16−18
−23.5%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 18−20
+20%
|
14−16
−20%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 21−24
+15.8%
|
18−20
−15.8%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 18−20
+20%
|
14−16
−20%
|
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 21−24
+16.7%
|
18−20
−16.7%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 14−16
+25%
|
12−14
−25%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 35−40
+24.1%
|
27−30
−24.1%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 27−30
+16.7%
|
24−27
−16.7%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 18−20
+20%
|
14−16
−20%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 27−30
+22.7%
|
21−24
−22.7%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 27−30
+21.7%
|
21−24
−21.7%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
+20%
|
30−33
−20%
|
| Hitman 3 | 27−30
+22.7%
|
21−24
−22.7%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 21−24
+23.5%
|
16−18
−23.5%
|
| Metro Exodus | 14−16
+15.4%
|
12−14
−15.4%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 18−20
+20%
|
14−16
−20%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 21−24
+15.8%
|
18−20
−15.8%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 21−24
+22.2%
|
18−20
−22.2%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 18−20
+20%
|
14−16
−20%
|
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 21−24
+16.7%
|
18−20
−16.7%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 14−16
+25%
|
12−14
−25%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 35−40
+24.1%
|
27−30
−24.1%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 18−20
+20%
|
14−16
−20%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 27−30
+22.7%
|
21−24
−22.7%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 27−30
+21.7%
|
21−24
−21.7%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
+20%
|
30−33
−20%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 21−24
+22.2%
|
18−20
−22.2%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 18−20
+20%
|
14−16
−20%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 16−18
+23.1%
|
12−14
−23.1%
|
| Hitman 3 | 16−18
+21.4%
|
14−16
−21.4%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 14−16
+15.4%
|
12−14
−15.4%
|
| Metro Exodus | 10−11
+25%
|
8−9
−25%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 8−9
+33.3%
|
6−7
−33.3%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 12−14
+18.2%
|
10−12
−18.2%
|
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 9−10
+28.6%
|
7−8
−28.6%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 6−7
+50%
|
4−5
−50%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 18−20
+35.7%
|
14−16
−35.7%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7
+20%
|
5−6
−20%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 16−18
+21.4%
|
14−16
−21.4%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 18−20
+26.7%
|
14−16
−26.7%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 18−20
+26.7%
|
14−16
−26.7%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 6−7
+50%
|
4−5
−50%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 7−8
+16.7%
|
6−7
−16.7%
|
| Hitman 3 | 10−11
+25%
|
8−9
−25%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 8−9
+14.3%
|
7−8
−14.3%
|
| Metro Exodus | 4−5
+33.3%
|
3−4
−33.3%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 6−7
+20%
|
5−6
−20%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 5−6
+25%
|
4−5
−25%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 8−9
+33.3%
|
6−7
−33.3%
|
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 5−6
+25%
|
4−5
−25%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 3−4
+50%
|
2−3
−50%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 9−10
+50%
|
6−7
−50%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 9−10
+12.5%
|
8−9
−12.5%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 10−12
+10%
|
10−11
−10%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 12−14
+18.2%
|
10−12
−18.2%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 3−4
+50%
|
2−3
−50%
|
Advantages and disadvantages
| Performance rating | 10.11 | 8.43 |
| Recency | 30 May 2013 | 6 January 2011 |
| Memory bus width | 128 | 256 |
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1536 | 768 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Thermal design power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 2 Watt |
Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends
since it shows better performance.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Competitors of GeForce GTX 765M SLI by AMD
According to our data, the closest equivalent to GeForce GTX 765M SLI by AMD is Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire, which is slower by 3% and lower by 12 positions in our rating.
Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GTX 765M SLI:
Competitors of GeForce GTX 675M SLI by AMD
We believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce GTX 675M SLI from AMD is Radeon R9 M390X, which is nearly equal in speed and higher by 2 positions in our rating.
Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GTX 675M SLI:
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
