Radeon R5 340 OEM vs GeForce GTX 760A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking870not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.58no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameGK106Oland
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date17 March 2014 (12 years ago)5 May 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768384
Core clock speed628 MHz730 MHz
Boost clock speed657 MHz780 MHz
Number of transistors2,540 million950 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate42.0518.72
Floating-point processing power1.009 TFLOPS0.599 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs6424
L1 Cache64 KB96 KB
L2 Cache256 KB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Lengthno data145 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1002 MHz1150 MHz
Memory bandwidth64.13 GB/s36.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA3.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 March 2014 5 May 2015
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 65 Watt

GTX 760A has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 18% lower power consumption.

R5 340 OEM, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 760A and Radeon R5 340 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 760A is a notebook graphics card while Radeon R5 340 OEM is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 28 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 760A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 61 votes

Rate Radeon R5 340 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 760A or Radeon R5 340 OEM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.