Radeon Pro V340 8 GB vs GeForce GTX 760A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking813not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.09no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGK106Vega 10
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date17 March 2014 (11 years ago)26 August 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7683584 ×2
Core clock speed628 MHz852 MHz
Boost clock speed657 MHz1500 MHz
Number of transistors2,540 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt230 Watt
Texture fill rate42.05336.0 ×2
Floating-point processing power1.009 TFLOPS10.75 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs1664 ×2
TMUs64224 ×2
L1 Cache64 KB896 KB
L2 Cache256 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB ×2
Memory bus width128 Bit2048 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed1002 MHz945 MHz
Memory bandwidth64.13 GB/s483.8 GB/s ×2

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA3.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 March 2014 26 August 2018
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 230 Watt

GTX 760A has 318.2% lower power consumption.

Pro V340 8 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 760A and Radeon Pro V340 8 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 760A is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro V340 8 GB is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A
GeForce GTX 760A
AMD Radeon Pro V340 8 GB
Radeon Pro V340 8 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 28 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 760A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Radeon Pro V340 8 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 760A or Radeon Pro V340 8 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.