RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs GeForce GTX 760A

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking870not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.58no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGK106AD107
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date17 March 2014 (12 years ago)21 March 2023 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7683072
Core clock speed628 MHz1530 MHz
Boost clock speed657 MHz2010 MHz
Number of transistors2,540 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate42.05193.0
Floating-point processing power1.009 TFLOPS12.35 TFLOPS
ROPs1648
TMUs6496
Tensor Coresno data96
Ray Tracing Coresno data24
L1 Cache64 KB3 MB
L2 Cache256 KB12 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1002 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth64.13 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA3.08.9
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 March 2014 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 50 Watt

RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation has an age advantage of 9 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 460% more advanced lithography process, and 10% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 760A and RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 760A is a notebook graphics card while RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 28 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 760A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 4 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 760A or RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.