Matrox Parhelia 128 MB vs GeForce GTX 760A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking808not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.07no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Parhelia (2002−2006)
GPU code nameGK106Parhelia-512
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date17 March 2014 (11 years ago)25 June 2002 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768no data
Core clock speed628 MHz200 MHz
Boost clock speed657 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,540 million80 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Wattno data
Texture fill rate42.050.8
Floating-point processing power1.009 TFLOPSno data
ROPs164
TMUs644
L1 Cache64 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 4x
Lengthno data175 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount2 GB128 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1002 MHz250 MHz
Memory bandwidth64.13 GB/s16 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)8.1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.5
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 March 2014 25 June 2002
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 150 nm

GTX 760A has an age advantage of 11 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 435.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 760A and Matrox Parhelia 128 MB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 760A is a notebook graphics card while Matrox Parhelia 128 MB is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A
GeForce GTX 760A
Matrox Parhelia 128 MB
Parhelia 128 MB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 28 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 760A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.5 4 votes

Rate Matrox Parhelia 128 MB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 760A or Matrox Parhelia 128 MB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.