Atari VCS 400 GPU vs GeForce GTX 760A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking813not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.09no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGK106Banded Kestrel
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date17 March 2014 (11 years ago)14 December 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$249

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768192
Core clock speed628 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed657 MHz1201 MHz
Number of transistors2,540 million4,940 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate42.0514.41
Floating-point processing power1.009 TFLOPS0.4612 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs6412
L1 Cache64 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Lengthno data295 mm
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR4
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1002 MHz1200 MHz
Memory bandwidth64.13 GB/s38.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.1.1261.2
CUDA3.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 March 2014 14 December 2020
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 15 Watt

Atari VCS 400 GPU has an age advantage of 6 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 266.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 760A and Atari VCS 400 GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 760A is a notebook graphics card while Atari VCS 400 GPU is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A
GeForce GTX 760A
AMD Atari VCS 400 GPU
Atari VCS 400 GPU

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 28 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 760A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Atari VCS 400 GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 760A or Atari VCS 400 GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.