Radeon HD 7330M vs GeForce GTX 760 X2

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGK104Robson
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date19 November 2013 (12 years ago)7 January 2012 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1152 ×280
Core clock speed1006 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speed1072 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,540 million292 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt5 Watt
Texture fill rate102.9 ×24.000
Floating-point processing power2.47 TFLOPS ×20.08 TFLOPS
ROPs32 ×24
TMUs96 ×28
L1 Cache96 KB16 KB
L2 Cache512 KB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length279 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB ×21 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit ×264 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.3 GB/s ×212.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors3x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 November 2013 7 January 2012
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 5 Watt

GTX 760 X2 has an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 43% more advanced lithography process.

HD 7330M, on the other hand, has 4900% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 760 X2 and Radeon HD 7330M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 760 X2 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon HD 7330M is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 22 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 760 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Radeon HD 7330M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 760 X2 or Radeon HD 7330M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.