Radeon 520 Mobile DDR3 vs GeForce GTX 760 X2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameGK104Banks
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date19 November 2013 (12 years ago)18 April 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1152 ×2320
Core clock speed1006 MHz1030 MHz
Boost clock speed1072 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,540 million690 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate102.9 ×220.60
Floating-point processing power2.47 TFLOPS ×20.6592 TFLOPS
ROPs32 ×28
TMUs96 ×220
L1 Cache96 KB80 KB
L2 Cache512 KB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length279 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB ×22 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit ×264 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.3 GB/s ×216 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors3x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.16.5 (5.1)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1 (1.2)
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.170
CUDA3.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 November 2013 18 April 2017
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 50 Watt

520 Mobile DDR3 has an age advantage of 3 years, and 400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 760 X2 and Radeon 520 Mobile DDR3. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 760 X2 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon 520 Mobile DDR3 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 22 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 760 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 12 votes

Rate Radeon 520 Mobile DDR3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 760 X2 or Radeon 520 Mobile DDR3, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.