Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 2.1 TFLOPS vs GeForce GTX 760 X2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)no data
GPU code nameGK104no data
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date19 November 2013 (12 years ago)3 September 2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1152 ×2768
Core clock speed1006 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1072 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,540 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate102.9 ×2no data
Floating-point processing power2.47 TFLOPS ×2no data
ROPs32 ×2no data
TMUs96 ×2no data
L1 Cache96 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length279 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5LPDDR5x
Maximum RAM amount2 GB ×2no data
Memory bus width256 Bit ×2128 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz8448 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.3 GB/s ×2no data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors3x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPortno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12_1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.1.126-
CUDA3.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 November 2013 3 September 2024
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 20 Watt

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 2.1 TFLOPS has an age advantage of 10 years, a 600% more advanced lithography process, and 1150% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 760 X2 and Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 2.1 TFLOPS. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 760 X2 is a desktop graphics card while Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 2.1 TFLOPS is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 X2
GeForce GTX 760 X2
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 2.1 TFLOPS
SD X Adreno X1-45 2.1 TFLOPS

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 17 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 760 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 45 votes

Rate Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 2.1 TFLOPS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 760 X2 or Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 2.1 TFLOPS, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.