Radeon RX 5700 vs GeForce GTX 760 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated121
Place by popularitynot in top-10074
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data46.69
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Navi / RDNA (2019−2020)
GPU code nameGK104Navi 10
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date6 November 2016 (7 years ago)7 July 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$349

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores13442304
Core clock speed823 MHz1465 MHz
Boost clock speed1046 MHz1725 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)170 Watt180 Watt
Texture fill rate117.2248.4
Floating-point processing power2.812 gflops7.949 gflops
ROPs3264
TMUs112144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length241 mm268 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed6.6 GB/s14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth211.2 GB/s448.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.11.2.131
CUDA3.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 November 2016 7 July 2019
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 180 Watt

GTX 760 OEM has 5.9% lower power consumption.

RX 5700, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 760 OEM and Radeon RX 5700. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM
GeForce GTX 760 OEM
AMD Radeon RX 5700
Radeon RX 5700

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 39 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 760 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1663 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.